Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Week 2 Activities

Activity 2- TPACK
TPACK- Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge.

Framework: Pedagogical Content Knowledge  



Must know:
-          Select appropriate content knowledge and processes for student learning
-          Know what pedagogies best support great learning
-          Consider ICT and digital tools to transform learning


Activity 3- Working in a wiki
Mobile phones- Should they be used within the classroom? I added my ideas and opinions and they are listed below.
 Process: Where are we now? What is the next step? Where have we been? What sort of thinking is needed?
In today's day and age I can understand the want not need for mobile phones in Education. We are living in a technological world but I think it is going a bit far and out there by wanting mobile phones in the classroom.
We need to ask questions like: Why? Why do we need mobile phones within the classroom? What benefits will there be? What part of the phone will be used? Facebook? Text? Phone calls? What if only half the class has mobile phones? What will the other half use? Who will pay for them? I will agree as long as the reasons for mobile phones is appropriate. There are other technology that can provide some applications the same as a mobile. Eg- Ipads, which are now used within the classroom.
Intuitive- Feeling: How do I feel about this? What do I like about the idea? What don't I like about the idea?
I do not believe this is a good idea. I think this is going too far. We already have Ipads and laptops in our classrooms. Isn't that enough? I realise technology is growing but I believe we are getting too technical when it comes to mobile phones in the classroom. Students are meant to learn within the classroom and that will not be happening if they are buying the latest clothes, fighting on facebook or replying to their school friends on their mobile phones during class time.
Objective- Information: What information do I have? What are the facts? What information do I need? What do I want to KNOW?
As there are negatives and very few positives maybe a 'vote' can be given out. The facts would be included with some for and against points given out.


Activity 4- Blog reflection on wiki
Is this forum reflective of Behaviourism, constructivism, cognitivism, connectivism? One, or all of the above?
I think the forum relates well with connectivism as it is the learning theory for the digital age. “If networked learning is the 21st century way of learning, then access to a range of nodes of information, including static information and people who hold the knowledge is important. Critical information literacy is essential”.

What are the characteristics of the wiki design that lead you to that understanding?
I found I was able to understand better as each coloured hat was explained with questions to ask yourself. For example- Intuitive- Feeling: How do I feel about this? What do I like about the idea? What don't I like about the idea?

Reflect on your own personal participation in the wiki. What are the benefits, issues, drawbacks of participating in a wiki like this?
By asking myself the questions provided under each hat I was able to make an opinion of what I thought would be best for the students and the classroom teacher. Some issues were that when I completed my opinion there was only 1 other person who had voiced their opinion as well so it made it difficult to see where others were coming from since only 1 other person had participated.

How would it contribute to the learning of your students?
I was unable to make an opinion on the contribution of the learning of students by mobile phones.

How did the scaffold support the collection of a range of perspectives?
There was only my opinion and 1 others so I’m unsure as out perspectives were similar.


Activity 5- Optional forum activity
How do the two methods of collaboration compare?
I prefer to collaborate individually and usually face to face. I find it difficult collaborating via a wiki or email so when it comes to collaborating with others for a flex subject I try to pair up with someone from my campus as I am able to talk to them face to face and talk about the subject instead of emailing.

Which suits your learning preferences better?
Individual collaboration definitely works best of me.

Do you think either a whole-group or an individual collaboration approach would suit for every single activity in the duration of this course?
Individual but it depends on the other students as well but I do know it’s easier for me when it’s individual.

Would you select one or the other based on your learning requirements at any given time?
No, I’ve always worked best individually or one on one so I don’t think a whole group approach will ever be best for me.

Friday, 6 July 2012

Week 1 Activities

Activity 1- Learning styles
What is your learning style? What sorts of learning experiences would suit you best with your learning style?
I completed the online learning style inventory by Felder and Solomon as I was unsure on exactly what my preferences and balances were when it came to my learning. My results are recorded below:

Active and Reflective
Borderline both. More towards Active.
Sensing and Intuitive
Borderline both. More towards Intuitive.
Visual and Verbal
High Visual
Sequential and Global
Borderline both. More towards Sequential.


The above results show that I was highly visual which I can relate to as when it comes to results I would rather read a table or graph compared to a paragraph explaining the results. However, when it comes to reading emails I find that I understand the email better if it is verbally said to me (read to me) rather me reading it myself. I believe the other learning styles are correct as it depends on the situation I am focusing on whether I am one or the other.
According to Felder and Solomon, “If you are a visual learner, try to find diagrams, sketches, schematics, photographs, flow charts, or any other visual representation of course material that is predominantly verbal. Ask your instructor, consult reference books, and see if any videotapes or CD-ROM displays of the course material are available. Prepare a concept map by listing key points, enclosing them in boxes or circles, and drawing lines with arrows between concepts to show connections. Colour-code your notes with a highlighter so that everything relating to one topic is the same colour”.

Learning experiences that would best suit my learning style would be lessons that are hands on, group orientated, real life examples (maths-measuring the length of a basketball court) and visual aids such as ICTs (PowerPoint presentations).

In a traditional classroom of 25 students, how would you support the range of learning styles each lesson?
“It seems safe to state that learners have stable or slowly changing characteristics such as their identities, lifelong motivation and experiences of learning, physical and sensory access requirements, and related personal preferences eg. For particular kinds of information. But learners also have characteristics that develop in the process of learning, and that are dependent on the context in which they find themselves" (Beetham, 2006, p. 32).

Below are ways in which I would support each different learning style within a learning experience:
Active learners: Allow for group work with class members, whether it is one on one or larger groups.
Reflective learners: Ask higher-order thinking questions to students. Eg- Read the material and review what has been read and check for understanding by asking higher-order thinking questions.
Sensing learners: Relate learning materials to real life situations. Eg- 3 + 4 = 7. Use a number sentence. “My sister and I went to the shop. I bought 3 lollies and she bought 4. How many lollies did we have altogether?” I would use manipulatives to work out the sum. Eg- counters.
Intuitive learners: Re-read to the students that may need it. Eg- “Your 2nd spelling word is house, my house is painted blue. House.” The spelling word has been said 3 times and once all the words are completed I would go back through all 10 spelling words again so no words were missed.
Visual learners: When given the chance  use diagrams, sketches, schematics, photographs, flow charts, or any other visual representation of course material that is predominantly verbal.
Verbal learners: Encourage group work where students are gaining understanding of material by hearing classmates’ explanations. Allow time for each group member to speak.
Sequential learners: Relate new topics to other topics that students may already know about. Eg- “Last week we focused on $1 and $2 coins but today we are going to look at $5 notes which are more in value”.
Global learners: Allow time for students to apply new understandings. Relate the new topic to a familiar topic and allow students to work their way through the content.

With your current knowledge of ICT, how could your design and digital pedagogy support your learners better?
As a learning manager I would allow access to ICTs for my students. ICTs can be easy to adapt into a lesson depending on the content. For example, if students are needed to give an oral presentation on a topic, you can suggest that the use of a PowerPoint to assist their learning with ICTs. The learners will then be able to refer to the PowerPoint and not have to make their oral presentation too ‘wordy’ as the PowerPoint can do that for them. Students will also then be catering for their visual classmates as some students may be lost within the speech and need some visual guidance to understand what is being said.
What sort of profiling questions would you be asking about your learners to ensure you cater for everyone’s preferences?
It will never be possible to cater for all ‘preferences’ , however, “it is important to consider that all learners should be competent in accessing information in a variety of ways, and thus your design should not necessarily accommodate the preferences of all students where it is not appropriate”.
Profiling questions I would use:
What are your interests?
Would you rather work alone or in a group?
What learning style do you consider yourself?

How does ICT support differences in learning styles?
“ICT is well positioned to cater for all learners. Consider the infinite combinations available of individual and collaborative work, social networking, visual, auditory, and interactive resources, colour and multiple formatting opportunities. All work towards enhancing the experience of all learners”.


Activity 2- Multiple intelligences
I completed the online multiple intelligence test as I was unsure on exactly what abilities I excelled in and which ones I had troubles with.
My results are shown below:

Linguistic (Word smart)
17
Logical (Number smart)
16
Interpersonal (People smart)
16
Intrapersonal (Myself smart)
15
Musical (Music smart)
9
Visual/Spatial (Picture smart)
15
Naturalistic (Nature smart)
9
Kinaesthetic (Body smart)
11


According to the test I excel in linguistic, logical and interpersonal. I believe I am word and people smart but when it comes to logical I don’t believe that I should have scored high. It is fair to say though that my downfall is in naturalistic and musical.

How would you use this information to inform your learning design?
By allowing students to participate in the test it would be helpful when checking the knowledge of students. For example if I was about to teach a concept on different types of trees I would be about to refer to the test results to see which of my students are ‘nature smart’ and which students I would have to assist when completing the concept.


Activity 3- Reflection on Prensky’s ideas
What is your belief and understanding of the nature of today’s learners?
Prensky has divided today’s learners into two groups: digital natives and digital immigrants.
Natives- Are born into and grow up enveloped by digital technology and therefore develop a specific language and syntax around the technology.
Immigrants- Have a digital accent and have trouble engaging with the technology, certainly to the extent natives do. Immigrants are forced to adapt to the digital world.
I somewhat believe in the description of the two groups that Prensky has formatted. Not all students have access to ICTs so sometimes the only access they will have will be the access within the classroom environment. All students will be developing at different stages with technology as some will have the latest ipad and some won’t even know how to turn on a computer.
I believe that in today’s society teachers should assume students have not had the access to technology and teach the basic first. This can be done by setting aside 1 hour a week for a technology class to introduce or continue the use of ICTs.
Is there substance to the ‘engage or enrage’ argument?
Prensky claims that, “If you cannot engage young people in education then you will enrage them”. I don’t believe the right word is ‘enrage’ however I do think this is correct. It is important to engage students first within the learning experience before going ahead with the body of the lesson. The students need to be ‘hooked’ into the lesson before ‘hit with the heavy stuff’. This ‘hook’ may be a simple game to do with the concept which most teacher guides now include within the introduction of a lesson. If the students aren’t hooked at the start of the learning experiences are then chances are they will be lost throughout the rest of the lesson. Some signs that the lesson hasn’t been introduced properly will be: students are figgiting, talking, moving, not following instructions, being disruptive to the class, being rude and simply not understanding the concept.


Activity 4- Reflection on connectivism
A number of authors contest Siemon’s ideas. It is unsettling to be challenged about existing perceptions of ‘knowing’, in particular, the lack of purpose in asking our students to KNOW and be able to RECALL what they know in assessment.
Do you agree with them? Can you see Siemon’s point of view? What is your position?
Siemon states, “That it is no longer possible to know everything, this it is more important to identify how and where to find knowledge that it is to know.” Siemon is correct, it is not possible to know everything and the way to find out about the unknown is to research and find the correct answer. I believe this is a fair statement and is what learning managers should be focusing on when it comes to teaching concepts that aren’t familiar to students. Students should be given the opportunity to find their answers because at the end of the day, students will believe what the conclusion they have made over the conclusion the teacher told them.
Give an example of ways in which you could use this theory in your classroom/learning context?
As a learning manager I would this theory by allowing students to conduct their own research instead of being taught the concept. For example if I was to conduct an investigation of what happened the night the titanic sunk it would be beneficial to the students to use ICTs to research and come to their own conclusion then the conclusion being told to them. Students would take more knowledge out of the lesson if they are given the opportunity to be responsible for their learning. Classroom monitoring would be vital as groups of students would be browsing the internet.